翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Mannaz
・ Mannboro, Virginia
・ Mannchalay
・ Manne
・ Manne Building
・ Manne Dipico
・ Mann River
・ Mann River (New South Wales)
・ Mann River Nature Reserve
・ Mann Rubin
・ Mann Siding, New Brunswick
・ Mann Site
・ Mann Theatres
・ Mann Township, Bedford County, Pennsylvania
・ Mann tut was Mann kann
Mann v Goldstein
・ Mann Vasanai
・ Mann Village Theatre, Westwood
・ Mann von Welt
・ Mann Yadanarpon Airlines
・ Mann's Chapel
・ Mann's Creek Railroad
・ Mann's Lick
・ Mann's Patent Steam Cart and Wagon Company
・ Mann's World
・ Mann+Hummel
・ Mann, Wisconsin
・ Mann-Simons Cottage
・ Manna
・ Manna (actor)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Mann v Goldstein : ウィキペディア英語版
Mann v Goldstein

''Mann v Goldstein'' () 1 WLR 1091 is a UK insolvency law case concerning the bringing of a winding up petition when a company is alleged to be unable to repay its debts.
==Facts==
Peter and Anita Mann sought an injunction against a winding up petition by Mr Sidney Goldstein and his wife, as well as Wallander Laboratories Ltd, on the ground that the debts were under dispute. The four people were equal shareholders in two hairdressing businesses, Joanita Ltd in Pinner, London, managed by Mr Mann, and Chairmaine Coiffeur d’Art Ltd in Haverstock Hill, run by Mr Goldstein. Wallander Ltd sold wigs They fell out, and negotiated to separated the businesses, but these failed. Mr Goldstein brought the winding up petition alleging that he was owed £1869 16s 3d in directors’ fees, declared by Joanita in 1959-1960 but not paid. Mr Mann did not dispute this, but argued that more than this was paid out in £15 weekly sums from 1965 to 1967. Wallands Ltd argued it was owed £340 16s 6d for goods from Charmaine Ltd’s subsidiary, while the Manns argued that this was in fact owed by another company, Charmaine Marguerite Ltd.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Mann v Goldstein」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.